Published in

Canadian Science Publishing, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1(84), p. 259-264, 2004

DOI: 10.4141/p02-114

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Leaf absorption, withdrawal and remobilization of autumn-applied urea-N in apple

Journal article published in 2004 by S. Guak, D. Neilsen, P. Millard ORCID, N. E. Looney
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Six-year-old well-nourished Jonagold/M9 apple (Malus domestica) trees were sprayed 7 d after harvest with a 2% urea solution enriched with 9.9% atom 15N. Through 3 d of the absorption period, leaves absorbed 19.2% of the intercepted urea 15N. This low absorption could be in part due to unfavourable conditions, i.e., low temperatures (daily mean ≈5°C) and windy conditions following treatment. During leaf senescence, 48% of the urea 15N absorbed was withdrawn from leaves and most of that (95%) remained in the treated branch section. Of this portion, 65% of the urea 15N was found in dormant bark, 29% in wood, and 6% in flower buds. In the following spring, 46% of the stored urea 15N was remobilized for growth of the flower buds when sampled at the “pink” stage of bud development. This accounted for 3.8% of total N in these tissues. This contribution did not influence flower quality, estimated by the length of the period between flower opening and petal fall and the level of fruit set. Key words: Malus × domestica, urea-15N, flower bud growth, fruit set