Published in

SAGE Publications, European Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 3(21), p. 471-479, 2015

DOI: 10.1255/ejms.1369

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effect of response factor variations on the response distribution of complex mixtures

Journal article published in 2015 by Alexander Gundlach-Graham ORCID, Christie G. Enke
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The goal of “comprehensive” or “untargeted” analysis is to generate a list of all the compounds of a particular type in a complex mixture. To this end, modern analytical techniques, including high-resolution mass spectrometry, enable the individual detection of hundreds to tens of thousands of compounds, which can have response magnitudes that span several orders of magnitude. Moreover, we and others have found that many comprehensive analyses of complex mixtures result in a log-normal distribution of measured responses. The response distribution is not the concentration distribution but is related to it through the distribution of component response factors (RFs). Here, we present a theoretical investigation of how the shape of the RF distribution can impact the distribution of measured responses. We show that several distributions of RFs combined with a log-normal distribution of concentrations result in log-normal distributions of responses. Additionally, we find that deviations from log-normal responses depend on the shape of the RF distribution, and that, when they occur, these deviations occur in the low-response regions of the response distribution, which would often be below the detection limits for real measurements. In all cases, applying a distribution of RFs to a concentration distribution results in a response distribution that is both broader than the original concentration distribution and has a lower mean value than it would if the RFs for all the components were unity. Further, the distorting effect of the RF distribution can impair the determination of the original concentration distribution and the prediction of the number and concentrations of the undetected components.