Published in

SAGE Publications, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 13(21), p. 1670-1680, 2015

DOI: 10.1177/1352458514568174

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Burden of risk variants correlates with phenotype of multiple sclerosis

Journal article published in 2015 by Kelly Hilven, Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos, Bénédicte Dubois, An Goris ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: More than 100 common variants underlying multiple sclerosis (MS) susceptibility have been identified, but their effect on disease phenotype is still largely unknown. Objective: The objective of this paper is to assess whether the cumulative genetic risk score of currently known susceptibility variants affects clinical presentation. Methods: A cumulative genetic risk score was based on four human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and 106 non-HLA risk loci genotyped or imputed in 842 Belgian MS patients and 321 controls. Non-parametric analyses were applied. Results: An increased genetic risk is observed for MS patients, including subsets such as oligoclonal band-negative and primary progressive MS patients, compared to controls. Within the patient group, a stronger association between HLA risk variants and the presence of oligoclonal bands, an increased immunoglobulin G (IgG) index and female gender was apparent. Results suggest an association between a higher accumulation of non-HLA risk variants and increased relapse rate as well as shorter relapse-free intervals after disease onset. Conclusion: MS patients display a significantly increased genetic risk compared to controls, irrespective of disease course or presence of oligoclonal bands. Whereas the cumulative burden of non-HLA risk variants appears to be reflected in the relapses of MS patients, the HLA region influences intrathecal IgG levels.