Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Karger Publishers, Neonatology, 4(108), p. 259-265, 2015

DOI: 10.1159/000437203

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A Randomized Trial of Low-Flow Oxygen versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants

Journal article published in 2015 by Christian Heiring ORCID, Jesper Steensberg, Mia Bjerager, Gorm Greisen ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) stabilizes the residual volume and may decrease the risk of ‘atelectotrauma', potentially promoting lung development in neonates. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To assess whether replacing nCPAP by low-flow O<sub>2</sub> by nasal cannula affects lung function expressed as the arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratio (a/A pO<sub>2</sub> ratio) on postnatal day 28. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Preterm infants (birth weight <1,500 g and gestational age, GA >26 + 0 weeks) stable on nCPAP between postnatal days 4 and 7 were randomized to nCPAP or low-flow O<sub>2</sub> by nasal cannula (<0.2 liters/min). Study criteria defined how to wean/restart respiratory support or change from low-flow O<sub>2</sub> to nCPAP and vice versa. Transcutaneous monitoring was used for the assessment of the a/A pO<sub>2</sub> ratio on day 28 using a head box for all infants for accurate measurement and to eliminate possible effects from nCPAP or low-flow O<sub>2</sub> on oxygen requirement. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We enrolled 52 infants (nCPAP group n = 30 and low-flow O<sub>2</sub> group n = 22). The a/A pO<sub>2</sub> ratio at 28 days was 0.43 ± 0.17 (nCPAP group) versus 0.48 ± 0.18 (p = 0.36). The duration of nCPAP was 16.4 (low-flow group) versus 41.1 days (nCPAP group), p < 0.001. There was no difference between groups in the fraction needing any respiratory support at 36 weeks' corrected age, length of stay, weight at discharge, and relative weight gain. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Replacing nCPAP by low-flow O<sub>2</sub> in preterm infants with GA >26 weeks at the end of the first week of life did not seem to affect the a/A pO<sub>2</sub> ratio or weight gain negatively. Thus, prolonged nCPAP seems not to have a positive effect on lung function at 28 days of life and replacement by low-flow O<sub>2</sub> could reduce the cost of equipment and increase the ease of nursing.