Published in

American Society for Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology, 15(186), p. 4853-4853, 2004

DOI: 10.1128/jb.186.15.4853.2004

American Society for Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology, 15(186), p. 4854-4854, 2004

DOI: 10.1128/jb.186.15.4854.2004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Rebuttal: Adaptive Mutation in Escherichia coli (Foster)

Journal article published in 2004 by Susan M. Rosenberg ORCID, John R. Roth, Dan I. Andersson, P. J. Hastings
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

If mutations arose in nongrowing cells, as proposed in Fos- ter's paper (1), then stress-induced mutagenesis would seem inescapable. The plated population certainly grows very little. However, no evidence is provided that reversion occurs in this population and no effort is made to counter evidence to the contrary (see below)—that mutations actually arise in cells growing under selection within developing clones (rendering mutagenesis dispensable). (i) Reversion requires that the lac allele be leaky and lactose be present in the selection medium, suggesting a growth re- quirement. (ii) General mutagenesis is not induced by simple starvation (3) but is seen in the Cairns system when lactose is provided, suggesting dependence on growth. (iii) Clonally related unstable and stable lac cells are found within all revertant colonies, consistent with both types arising sequentially within a growing colony. (iv) Revertant number is strongly reduced if one inhibits growth of cells carrying a lac amplification. (v) Revertant number increases if a lac duplication is pro- vided in the parent cells. (vi) Results of the respreading experiment are not inconsis- tent with reversion within growing clones because single du-