Published in

American Astronomical Society, Astrophysical Journal, 1(785), p. 29, 2014

DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/29

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Magnetic Fields In Relativistic Collisionless Shocks

Journal article published in 2013 by Rodolfo Santana, Rodolfo Barniol Duran ORCID, Pawan Kumar
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We present a systematic study on magnetic fields in Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) external forward shocks (FSs). There are 60 (35) GRBs in our X-ray (optical) sample, mostly from Swift. We use two methods to study epsilon_B (fraction of energy in magnetic field in the FS). 1. For the X-ray sample, we use the constraint that the observed flux at the end of the steep decline is $\ge$ the X-ray FS flux. 2. For the optical sample, we use the condition that the observed flux arises from the FS (optical sample light curves decline as ~t^-1, as expected for the FS). Making a reasonable assumption on E (jet isotropic equivalent kinetic energy), we converted these conditions into an upper limit (measurement) on epsilon_B n^{2/(p+1)} for our X-ray (optical) sample, where n is the circumburst density and p is the electron index. Taking n=1 cm^-3, the distribution of epsilon_B measurements (upper limits) for our optical (X-ray) sample has a range of ~10^-8 -10^-3 (~10^-6 -10^-3) and median of ~few x 10^-5 (~few x 10^-5). To characterize how much amplification is needed, beyond shock compression of a seed magnetic field ~10 muG, we expressed our results in terms of an amplification factor, AF, which is very weakly dependent on n (AF propto n^0.21 ). The range of AF measurements (upper limits) for our optical (X-ray) sample is ~ 1-1000 (~10-300) with a median of ~50 (~50). These results suggest that some amplification, in addition to shock compression, is needed to explain the afterglow observations. ; Comment: Accepted to ApJ. Minor changes after Referee Report. 22 Pages, 7 Figures