Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Critical Care, 4(15), p. 229

DOI: 10.1186/cc10291

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16

Journal article published in 2011 by Jean-Louis Vincent, Andrew Rhodes, Azriel Perel, Greg S. Martin, Giorgio Della Della Ricca, Giorgio Della Rocca, Benoit Vallet, Michael R. Pinsky, Christoph K. Hofer, Jean-Louis Teboul, Willem-Pieter de Boode ORCID, W. P. de Boode, Sabino Scolletta, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Daniel De Backer and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Upload
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering an objective review of the available monitoring systems, including their specific advantages and limitations, and highlighting some key principles underlying hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review ; info:eu-repo/semantics/published