Published in

Elsevier, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 3(55), p. 235-247

DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.11.003

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Limitations to carbon assimilation by mild drought in nectarine trees growing under field conditions

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Publication Inra prise en compte dans l'analyse bibliométrique des publications scientifiques mondiales sur les Fruits, les Légumes et la Pomme de terre. Période 2000-2012. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/256699 ; The strategies used by nectarine trees (Prunus persica L. Batsch, var. Silver King) to cope with high light and high temperature/vapour pressure deficit conditions were evaluated in field-grown plants in central Portugal. Diurnal time courses of gas exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured "in situ" in attached leaves of well-watered or mild water-stressed plants under summer conditions. CO, assimilation rate (A.) and stomatal conductance (g,) of well-watered trees decreased along the day in response to high temperature and vapour pressure deficit. Soil water deficit increased the sensitivity of leaf gas exchange to summer atmospheric conditions; A. and g, exhibited important midday depressions under water shortage. During the day, the quantum yield of PSH electron transport in the light (phi(e)), the electron transport rate (ETR), the intrinsic efficiency of open PSII reaction centers (F'(v) /F'(m)), the photochemical quenching (q(p)) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of chlorophyll fluorescence remained constant in well-watered trees, in spite of some decrease in stomatal conductance in the afternoon. Water stress induced after midday a large, but reversible, decrease of phi 5, F'(v) / F'(m) and ETR, and an increase in NPQ. Simultaneously, an increase in ETR/A,, was observed. Since water stress led to a reduction in the number of PSH centers that remain open after midday, as indicated by the decrease in qp, the contribution of thermal de-excitation at PSH (given by NPQ) in the protection against photoinhibition became more important in stressed trees. The increase in ETR/A(n) suggests that in water stressed plants the excitation energy in the photosynthetic apparatus, that would normally be consumed via CO, assimilation, is partially diverted to the photosynthetic reduction of 0,, via photorespiration, Mehler-peroxidase reaction or the water-water cycle. Although electrons not consumed in photosynthetic process may generate active oxygen species, this is not likely to occur in water-stressed nectarine leaves, since chlorophyll concentrations were not decreased (there was no chlorophyll bleaching) and the maximum potential PSH efficiency (estimated through the pre-dawn F-v / F-m ratio) remained high, which are symptoms of no PSII damage.