Published in

Ferrata Storti Foundation, Haematologica, 4(98), p. 526-532

DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.065599

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The combination of sirolimus plus tacrolimus improves outcome after reduced-intensity conditioning, unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with cyclosporine plus mycofenolate

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background. Different graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis have been proposed in the setting of reduced intensity and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. An alternative combination with Sirolimus and Tacrolimus has recently been tested although comparative studies in front of the classical combination with a Calcineurin-inhibitor and Mycophenolate Mofetil or Methotrexate, are lacking. Design and Methods. We describe the results of a prospective multicenter trial using Sirolimus-Tacrolimus as immunoprophylaxis, and compare this approach with our previous experience using Cyclosporine-Mycophenolate in the unrelated donor transplant setting after reduced-intensity conditioning. Results. Forty-five patients received Cyclosporine-Mycophenolate between 2002 and mid-2007, while the subsequent 50 patients receiving transplants from late-2007 received Sirolimus-Tacrolimus. No significant differences were observed either in terms of hematopoietic recovery or acute graft versus host disease, although gastrointestinal aute graft versus host disease ≥2 was more common in the Cyclosporine-Mycophenolate group (55 vs. 21%, respectively, p=0.003). The 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft versus host disease was 50% versus 90% for Sirolimus versus Cyclosporine- based regimen, respectively (p<0.001), while the incidence of the extensive chronic disease was 27% versus 49%, respectively (p=0.043). Two-year non-relapse mortality was 18% versus 38% for patients receiving Sirolimus versus Cyclosporine- based regimen, respectively (p=0.02). The event-free survival and overall survival at 2 years were 53% versus 29% (p=0.028) and 70% versus 45% (p=0.018) among patients receiving Sirolimus versus Cyclosporine- based regimen, respectively. Conclusions. In the setting of reduced intensity transplantation from unrelated donor, promising results can be achieved with the combination of Sirolimus-Tacrolimus, due to a lower risk of chronic Graft versus host disease and non-relapse mortality, which translates into better event-free and overall survival, in comparison with Cyclosporine-Mycophenolate. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as 2007-006416-32 by GEL-TAMO/GETH.