Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Public Library of Science, PLoS Medicine, 9(11), p. e1001713, 2014

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001713

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Genetic Predisposition to Increased Blood Cholesterol and Triglyceride Lipid Levels and Risk of Alzheimer Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Journal article published in 2015 by P. Proitsi, M. K. Lupton, Latha Velayudhan ORCID, Stephen Newhouse, Isabella Fogh, Lupton Mk, Magda Tsolaki, Makrina Daniilidou, J. Williams, Megan Pritchard, D. Harold ORCID, Iwona Kloszewska, R. Sims, A. Gerrish, Hilkka Soininen and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background Although altered lipid metabolism has been extensively implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD) through cell biological, epidemiological, and genetic studies, the molecular mechanisms linking cholesterol and AD pathology are still not well understood and contradictory results have been reported. We have used a Mendelian randomization approach to dissect the causal nature of the association between circulating lipid levels and late onset AD (LOAD) and test the hypothesis that genetically raised lipid levels increase the risk of LOAD. Methods and Findings We included 3,914 patients with LOAD, 1,675 older individuals without LOAD, and 4,989 individuals from the general population from six genome wide studies drawn from a white population (total n=10,578). We constructed weighted genotype risk scores (GRSs) for four blood lipid phenotypes (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-c], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-c], triglycerides, and total cholesterol) using well-established SNPs in 157 loci for blood lipids reported by Willer and colleagues (2013). Both full GRSs using all SNPs associated with each trait at p