Published in

Journal of Rheumatology, The Journal of Rheumatology, 12(35), p. 2415

DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080295

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction Following Joint Replacement Surgery

Journal article published in 2008 by Rajiv Gandhi, J. Roderick Davey, Nizar N. Mahomed
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ObjectiveThe incidence of patient-reported dissatisfaction following total joint arthroplasty can be up to 30%. Our aim was to identify the preoperative patient-level predictors of patient dissatisfaction 1 year after surgery.MethodsWe surveyed 1720 patients undergoing primary hip or knee replacement surgery. Relevant covariates including demographic data, body mass index, sex, comorbidities, and education were recorded. Joint functional status and patient quality of life were assessed at baseline and at 1-year followup with the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) scales, respectively. Patient satisfaction with surgery was determined with 4 survey questions at 1-year followup.ResultsThere were no significant differences in demographic data between satisfied (n = 1290) and dissatisfied patients (n = 430). Logistic regression modeling showed that a lower preoperative SF-36 Mental Health score independently predicted patient dissatisfaction with surgery, adjusted for all relevant covariates (p < 0.05). We found no correlation between patient satisfaction and WOMAC change scores at 1-year followup (p = 0.31).ConclusionPreoperative mental health is an important factor to consider when understanding patient satisfaction with surgery. Interventions to reduce psychological distress prior to surgery should be studied to determine if they may improve subjective outcomes of patients undergoing joint replacement surgery.