Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 3(26), p. 247-255, 2011

DOI: 10.1177/1545968311415862

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Pilot Trial of Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy With Trunk Restraint to Improve Poststroke Reach to Grasp and Trunk Kinematics

Journal article published in 2011 by Ching-Yi Wu ORCID, Yi-An Chen, Hsieh-Ching Chen, Keh-Chung Lin ORCID, I.-Ling Yeh
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background. Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is effective in improving upper extremity motor function, but evidence is lacking about effectiveness grasp and trunk control. Objective. This study investigated whether distributed CIT combined with trunk restraint (dCIT + TR) benefited movement kinematics of grasping and the trunk, as well as motor ability of the upper extremity, more than dCIT alone. Methods. A total of 45 stroke participants received 2 hours of dCIT + TR, dCIT, or the dose-matched control intervention for 3 weeks. Movement kinematics, motor ability, and daily function were the outcome measures. Movement kinematics included grasping, joint range, and trunk movement at various phases of reach-to-grasp tasks. Motor ability and daily function of all participants were evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Activity Log. Results. Four to 5 participants in each group were not included for kinematic analysis because of their inability to grasp a can. The dCIT + TR group showed better preplanned grasping movement and less trunk motion at the early phase of the reach-to-grasp movements than the dCIT or control groups. Compared with the controls, the dCIT + TR participants showed better motor ability in the overall and distal arm scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. The dCIT + TR and dCIT participants demonstrated significantly greater functional use of the affected arm. Conclusions. Administering dCIT + TR produced additional benefits by improving grasping control and reversing the compensatory trunk movement at the early phase of a reach-to-grasp movement. The use of experimental tasks beyond and within arm’s length might improve our understanding of optimal upper extremity rehabilitation.