Published in

SAGE Publications, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 3(39), p. 312-318

DOI: 10.1177/1403494811402412

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the Swedish version of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)) without bone mass density (BMD) in a Danish population to examine the possibility of applying this version to Danish women. Methods: From the Danish National Register of social security numbers, we randomly selected 5000 women living in the region of Southern Denmark aged 40—90 years to receive a mailed questionnaire concerning risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX. The predicted 10-year probability of hip fractures was calculated for each woman returning a complete questionnaire using the Swedish version of FRAX. The observed 10-year hip fracture risk was also calculated for each woman using age-specific hip fracture rates from the National Hospital Discharge Register and National survival tables. Results: A total of 4194 (84%) women responded to the questionnaire and 3636 (73%) gave complete information and were included in the analysis. Using FRAX, the predicted 10-year fracture risk was 7.6%, ranging from 0.3 to 25.0% at the age of 41—50 and 81—90, respectively, while the corresponding observed fracture risk was 7.6%, ranging from 0.4 to 24.0%, respectively and not significantly different from the predicted risk (p = 0.92). Conclusions: The Swedish version of FRAX without BMD is applicable to Danish women.