Published in

Royal College of General Practitioners, British Journal of General Practice, 602(62), p. e605-e615, 2012

DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12x654579

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Developing a complex intervention to reduce time to presentation with symptoms of lung cancer

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the commonest cause of cancer in Scotland and is usually advanced at diagnosis. Median time between symptom onset and consultation is 14 weeks, so an intervention to prompt earlier presentation could support earlier diagnosis and enable curative treatment in more cases. AIM: To develop and optimise an intervention to reduce the time between onset and first consultation with symptoms that might indicate lung cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Iterative development of complex healthcare intervention according to the MRC Framework conducted in Northeast Scotland. METHOD: The study produced a complex intervention to promote early presentation of lung cancer symptoms. An expert multidisciplinary group developed the first draft of the intervention based on theory and existing evidence. This was refined following focus groups with health professionals and high-risk patients. RESULTS: First draft intervention components included: information communicated persuasively, demonstrations of early consultation and its benefits, behaviour change techniques, and involvement of spouses/partners. Focus groups identified patient engagement, achieving behavioural change, and conflict at the patient-general practice interface as challenges and measures were incorporated to tackle these. Final intervention delivery included a detailed self-help manual and extended consultation with a trained research nurse at which specific action plans were devised. CONCLUSION: The study has developed an intervention that appeals to patients and health professionals and has theoretical potential for benefit. Now it requires evaluation.