Published in

Karger Publishers, American Journal of Nephrology, 5(26), p. 503-510, 2006

DOI: 10.1159/000097366

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Blood Pressure Recordings within and outside the Clinic and Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Kidney Disease

Journal article published in 2006 by Rajiv Agarwal ORCID, Martin J. Andersen
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<i>Background:</i> Blood pressure (BP) measured outside the clinic correlates better with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with essential hypertension. To assess the role of out-of-clinic BP recordings in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a prospective cohort study was conducted in 217 veterans with CKD. <i>Methods:</i> BP was measured outside the clinic at home and by 24-hour ambulatory recordings, and in the clinic by ‘routine’ and standardized methods. Patients were followed over a median of 3.4 years to assess the combined end-point of total mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke. <i>Results:</i> Average (±SD) home BP was 147.0 ± 21.4/78.3 ± 11.6 mm Hg, 24-hour ambulatory BP 133.5 ± 16.6/73.1 ± 11.1 mm Hg and in-clinic BPs were 155.2 ± 25.6/84.7 ± 14.2 mm Hg by the standardized method, and 144.5 ± 24.2/75.4 ± 14.7 mm Hg by the ‘routine’ method. A 1 SD increase in systolic BP increased the hazard ratio (HR) of the composite end-point by 1.16 (95% CI 0.89–1.50) for routine BP, 1.57 (95% CI 1.19–2.09) for standardized BP, 1.66 (95% CI 1.27–2.17) for home BP, and 1.42 (95% CI 1.10–1.84) for 24-hour ambulatory BP recording. The HR of the composite end-point was only significant for hypertension defined by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (HR 2.22 (95% CI 1.23–4.01)). Adjusted for the propensity scores, BP measured by the ambulatory technique was not an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Non-dipping was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but not when adjusted for other risk factors. <i>Conclusion:</i> Risk factors that differentiate hypertension or non-dipping appear to confer a cardiovascular risk in CKD.