Published in

Karger Publishers, Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 1(50), p. 22-27, 1998

DOI: 10.1159/000023196

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Growth Hormone Treatment in Growth Hormone-Sufficient and -Insufficient Children with Intrauterine Growth Retardation/Russell-Silver Syndrome

Journal article published in 1998 by C. Azcona ORCID, A. Albanese, P. Bareille, R. Stanhope
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Fifty-eight short prepubertal children with IUGR received GH treatment (mean dose: 28 IU/m<sup>2</sup>/week) for a mean (SEM) period of time of 3.4 (0.13) years (range 1–4 years). They were subdivided according to their GH response to a pharmacological test. Twenty-six were GH insufficient (GHI) (group 1) and 32 were non-GHI (group 2). At the commencement of GH therapy mean chronological age was 6.1 (0.4) years in both groups, mean height SDS (SEM) was –3.5 (0.2) in group 1 and –3.6 (0.2) in group 2, mean growth velocity (GV) SDS (SEM) was –1.9 (0.3) in group 1 and –0.3 (0.2) in group 2. GH therapy induced significant growth acceleration throughout the follow-up period without any significant differences between the two groups. GV SDS (SEM) increased to +3.0 (0.5) in group 1 and to +3.7 (0.4) in group 2 (p < 0.05 compared to baseline) during the first year of therapy. Subsequently, the growth-promoting effects of GH therapy diminished with time but GV remained significantly higher than baseline. This growth enhancement produced a significant rise in height SDS (SEM) reaching –1.4 (0.2) in group 1 and –1.7 (0.2) in group 2 after 4 years. In conclusion, our data did not show any significant differences in the growth response to GH therapy between GH-sufficient and -insufficient IUGR children who were only distinguishable by their GH secretion. This indicates that the decision to treat a short IUGR child with GH therapy should not be based upon the GH response to a provocative test.