Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 5(19), p. 312-316

DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.006

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Wrongful birth: clinical settings and legal implications.

Journal article published in 2014 by Majid Hassan, Lyn Chitty ORCID, Harry Reardon
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

'Wrongful birth' is a term used in the English legal system when describing negligence claims for compensation brought against hospitals where it is argued on behalf of parents bringing the claim that with appropriate treatment their child should not have been born. This paper considers the basis for such claims and the difference between claims brought where there is a healthy child compared to one where the child is born with a disability. Claims arising from failed sterilisations are reviewed as well as those due to an alleged failure to detect fetal anomalies on routine ultrasound scanning. In regard to the latter we review the findings of a major report looking at such claims in England, and we consider practical learning and risk management points that can help to reduce the chances of litigation.