Published in

SAGE Publications, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 4(217), p. 311-316, 2003

DOI: 10.1243/095441103322060776

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Bladder reconstruction—from cells to materials

Journal article published in 2003 by J. Southgate ORCID, W. Cross, I. Eardley, D. F. M. Thomas, L. K. Trejdosiewicz
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Surgical reconstruction of the urinary bladder is performed on patients of all ages for a diverse range of conditions, including congenital abnormalities, bladder dysfunction, trauma and cancer. The most common material utilized to augment or replace the bladder during these procedures is a segment of the patient's own intestine. However, this procedure (‘enterocytoplasty’) is associated with significant clinical complications that arise due to the exposure of the epithelial lining of the intestine to urine. A number of alternative approaches are being actively developed to find a practical and functional substitute for native bladder tissue. These range from ‘composite enterocystoplasty’, where the de-epithelialized intestine wall is lined with bladder epithelial cells that have been propagated in vitro, to augmenting the urinary system with natural or synthetic biomaterials that may incorporate in vitro-propagated cells. However, if tissue-engineered products are to have therapeutic application in bladder reconstruction, a number of issues remain to be addressed; these issues are discussed briefly below.