Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Anesthesiology, 3(89), p. 657-665., 1998

DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199809000-00015

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Experimental Determination of Heat Flow Parameters during Induction of General Anesthesia:

Journal article published in 1998 by Daniel I. Sessler ORCID, Andrew M. Sessler
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background Alterations in body temperature result from changes in tissue heat content. Heat flow is a complex function of vasomotor status and core, peripheral, and ambient temperatures. Consequently it is difficult to quantify specific mechanisms responsible for observed changes in body heat distribution. Therefore the authors developed two mathematical models that independently express regional tissue heat production and the motion of heat through tissues in terms of measurable quantities. Methods The equilibrium model expresses the effective regional heat transfer coefficient in terms of cutaneous heat flux, skin temperature, and temperature at the center of the extremity. It applies at steady states and provides a ratio of the heat transfer coefficients before and after an intervention. In contrast, the heat flow model provides a time-dependent estimate of the heat transfer coefficient in terms of ambient temperature, skin temperature, and temperature at the center of the extremity. Results Each model was applied to data acquired in a previous evaluation of heat balance during anesthesia induction. The relation between the ratio of steady state regional heat transfer coefficients calculated using each model was linear. The effective heat transfer coefficient for the forehead (a core site) decreased approximately 20% after induction of anesthesia. In contrast, heat transfer coefficients in the six tested extremity sites more than doubled. Conclusions Effective heat transfer coefficients can be used to evaluate the thermal effects of various clinical interventions, such as induction of regional anesthesia or administration of vasodilating drugs. The heat transfer coefficient for the forehead presumably decreased because general anesthesia reduces brain perfusion. In contrast, increased heat transfer coefficients in the extremity sites indicate that thermoregulatory and anesthetic-induced vasodilation more than doubles the core-to-peripheral flow of heat. This flow of heat causes redistribution hypothermia, which is usually the major cause of core hypothermia during anesthesia.