A Response to Jason et al. (2009), "Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control's Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition"
Journal article published in 2009 by
William C. Reeves,
Brian M. Gurbaxani,
Jin-Mann S. Lin,
Elizabeth R. Unger 
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
Full text: Unavailable
Published version:
archiving forbidden
Data provided by 
Abstract
The recent article by Jason, Najar, Porter, and Reh, “Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control’s Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition” (2009; Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20:2, 93—100) attempted to critically explore several pertinent issues concerning diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Most of these issues have been brewing since international adoption of the 1994 CFS case definition by Fukuda et al., and it is high time to address them in a peer-reviewed and public forum.