Published in

SAGE Publications, Angiology: The Journal of Vascular Diseases, 5(59), p. 549-558

DOI: 10.1177/0003319707309656

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effects of Cilostazol and Pentoxifylline on Forearm Reactive Hyperemia Response, Lipid Profile, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Intermittent Claudication

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease may lead to lower limb claudication and increased risk of systemic vascular dysfunction. In this article, the authors have investigated the peripheral vascular dysfunction evaluating forearm blood flow using venous occlusion plethysmography, lipid profile, and C-reactive protein in 60 patients with moderate intermittent claudication treated during 20 weeks with placebo (n = 16), cilostazol (200 mg/d; n = 17), or pentoxifylline (1200 mg/d; n = 15) in a randomized double-blinded clinical trial, taking into account smoking. Forearm blood flow after reactive hyperemia response (FBFh ) or oral nitroglycerine spray to evaluate endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vasodilation, respectively, pain-free and maximal walking distance, levels of C-reactive protein, triglycerides, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein—cholesterol in plasma were determined. The results showed that there was an improvement in the high-density lipoprotein—cholesterol, pain-free and maximal walking distance, and FBFh independent of treatment in nonsmoking patients. Cilostazol increased high-density lipoprotein—cholesterol level, maximal walking distance, and FBFh, whereas pentoxifylline reduced C-reactive protein level and increased maximal walking distance in total and nonsmoking groups. No treatment was effective in smokers