The central problem of complex inheritance is to combine evidence from data that typically differ in markers, phenotypes, ascertainment, and other factors, without sacrificing the reliability that lods have given to linkage mapping for major loci. Here we evaluate 5 possible solutions on 200 replicates simulated in Genetic Analysis Workshop 10. Two methods differ from less efficient ones by distinguishing the tails of a normal distribution. Maximum likelihood scores (currently implemented only for the BETA model) and the approach of Self and Liang perform about as well as pooling samples, which is not feasible with heterogeneous data. With moderately heterogeneous data the Self and Liang method appears to be more efficient than maximum likelihood scores. Although improvements are being made in sample design and statistical analysis, the problem of combining linkage evidence from multiple data sets appears to have been solved. Allelic association presents different problems not yet addressed.