Published in

Complementary Therapies in Nursing and Midwifery, 1(6), p. 19-24

DOI: 10.1054/ctnm.1999.0440

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

CAM research and development

Journal article published in 2000 by George Lewith ORCID, Stephen Holgate
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The growth in complementary medicine and its integration into conventional medicine will certainly require the development of a well defined research strategy within the UK. This paper summarizes discussions that occurred under the umbrella of the Foundation for Integrated Medicine, involving both conventional and complementary medical practitioners. It is the first UK-based consensus document that defines a research strategy for complementary and alternative medicine and looks specifically at problems such as priority setting, research methodology, research capacity and support, potential funding streams and possible routes for the dissemination of CAM research. It concludes that for CAM to have an established future within UK healthcare, it must be subject to rigorous scrutiny. The methods employed should be appropriate to the task and should embrace a wide spectrum, both quantitative, qualitative and incorporating projects that involve good practice and audit.