Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2(112), p. 378-379, 2008

DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318182ca9d

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2(112), p. 378, 2008

DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318182ca68

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 5(111), p. 1216, 2008

DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31817270e3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Optimal Catheter Placement During Sonohysterography: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cervical to Uterine Placement:

Journal article published in 2008 by Rachel L. Spieldoch, Tom C. Winter, Calisa Schouweiler, Roger Sanders, Susan Ansay, Steve Lindheim, Michael D. Evans, Giuseppe Ricci ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Upload
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

There is not sufficient evidence to suggest routine intracervical catheter placement for sonohysterography or hysterosalpingography. Each year millions of women undergo these procedures. Any change in standard technique should be evidence based.