Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, NeuroReport, 9(9), p. 2153-2158, 1998

DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199806220-00045

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, NeuroReport, 7(9), p. 1673-1678, 1998

DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199805110-00075

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, NeuroReport, 1(9), p. 85-89, 1998

DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199801050-00017

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Neural activity in areas V1, V2 and V4 during free viewing of natural scenes compared to controlled viewing:

Journal article published in 1998 by Jack L. Gallant, Charles E. Connor, David C. Van Essen ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Under natural viewing conditions primates make frequent exploratory eye movements across complex scenes. We recorded neural activity of 62 cells in visual areas V1, V2 and V4 in an awake behaving monkey that freely viewed natural images. About half of the cells studied showed a modulation in firing rate following some of the eye movements made during free viewing, though the proportions showing a discernible modulation varied across areas. These cells were also examined under controlled viewing conditions in which gratings or natural image patches were flashed in and around the classical receptive field while the animal performed a fixation task. Activity rates were generally highest with flashed gratings and lowest during free viewing. Flashed natural image patches evoked responses between these two extremes, and the responses were higher when the patches were confined to the classical receptive field than when they extended into the non-classical surround. Thus the reduction of activity during free viewing relative to that obtained with flashed gratings is partly attributable to natural images being less effective stimuli and partly to suppressive spatio-temporal neural mechanisms that are important during natural vision.