Published in

50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference

DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-2562

Elsevier, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 7-8(47), p. 901-911, 2010

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.006

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

In-Plane Fracture of Laminated Fiber Reinforced Composites with Varying Fracture Resistance: Experimental Observations and Numerical Crack Propagation Simulations

Journal article published in 2009 by Siva Shankar Rudraraju ORCID, Amit Salvi, Krishna Garikipati, Anthony M. Waas
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A series of experimental results on the in-plane fracture of a fiber reinforced laminated composite panel is analyzed using the variational multi-scale cohesive method (VMCM). The VMCM results demonstrate the influence of specimen geometry and load distribution on the propagation of large scale bridging cracks in the fiber reinforced panel. Experimentally observed variation in fracture resistance is substantiated numerically by comparing the experimental and VMCM load-displacement responses of geometrically scaled single edge-notch three point bend (SETB) specimens. The results elucidate the size dependence of the traction-separation relationship for this class of materials even in moderately large specimens, contrary to the conventional understanding of it being a material property. The existence of a "free bridging zone" (different from the conventional "full bridging zone") is recognized, and its influence on the evolving fracture resistance is discussed. The numerical simulations and ensuing bridging zone evolution analysis demonstrates the versatility of VMCM in objectively simulating progressive crack propagation, compared against conventional numerical schemes like traditional cohesive zone modeling, which require a priori knowledge of the crack path. ; Comment: 24 pages, 16 figures