Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2(397), p. 1061-1072

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15068.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A Systematic Study of Variability in a Sample of Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

Journal article published in 2009 by L. M. Heil, S. Vaughan, T. P. Roberts ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We present results from a study of short term variability in 19 archival observations by XMM-Newton of 16 Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULXs). Eight observations (six sources) showed intrinsic variability with power spectra in the form of either a power law or broken power law-like continuum and in some cases quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs). The remaining observations were used to place upper limits on the strength of possible variability hidden within. Seven observations (seven sources) yielded upper limits comparable to, or higher than, the values measured from those observations with detectable variations. These represented the seven faintest sources all with f_x < 3x10^-12 erg cm^-2 s^-1. In contrast there are four observations (three sources) that gave upper limits significantly lower than both the values measured from the ULX observations with detectable variations, and the values expected by comparison with luminous Galactic black hole X-ray binaries (BHBs) and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) in the observed frequency bandpass (10^-3 - 1 Hz). This is the case irrespective of whether one assumes characteristic frequencies appropriate for a stellar mass (10 M_sun) or an intermediate mass (1000 M_sun) black hole, and means that in some ULXs the variability is significantly suppressed compared to bright BHBs and AGN. We discuss ways to account for this unusual suppression in terms of both observational and intrinsic effects and whether these solutions are supported by our results. Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures, accepted by MNRAS