Published in

American Chemical Society, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 5(54), p. 1564-1570, 2006

DOI: 10.1021/jf052544w

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A Rapid Confirmatory Method for Analyzing Tetracycline Antibiotics in Bovine, Swine, and Poultry Muscle Tissues:  Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion with Heated Water as Extractant followed by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A rapid, specific, and sensitive procedure for determining four widely used tetracycline antibiotics and three related epimers in bovine, swine, and poultry muscle tissues is presented. The method is based on the matrix solid-phase dispersion technique with heated water as the extractant followed by liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS) equipped with an electrospray ion source. Target compounds were extracted from tissues with 5 mL of water heated at 70 degrees C. After acidification and filtration, 100 mu L of the aqueous extract was injected in the LC column. MS data acquisition was performed in the multireaction monitoring mode, selecting two precursor ion to product ion transitions for each target compound. Heated water appeared to be an excellent extractant, since the absolute recovery data ranged between 70 and 78%. The accuracy of the method was determined at three spike levels, using minocycline as a surrogate analyte, in any different kind of muscle tissues considered and varied between 88 and 109% with relative standard deviations ranging between 3 and 11%. Limits of quantification were estimated to range between 1 (chlortetracycline) and 9 ng/g (4-epioxytetracycline), based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 10, and are well below the tolerance levels set by the European Union. The effects of the extraction temperature, volume of the extractant, and washing of the material supporting the biological matrix with ethylenediamine tetraacetic disodium salt on the analyte recovery were studied.