Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, ChemPhysChem, 5(17), p. 731-740, 2016

DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201500868

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Influence of the Inner‐Shell Architecture on Quantum Yield and Blinking Dynamics in Core/Multishell Quantum Dots

Journal article published in 2016 by Pooja Bajwa, Feng Gao, Anh Nguyen, Benard Omogo, Colin D. Heyes ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Choosing the composition of the shell for QDs is not trivial, since both the band-edge energy offset and interfacial lattice mismatch play roles in influencing the final optical properties. One way to balance these competing effects is by forming multi-shells and/or gradient-alloyed shells. However, this introduces multiple interfaces and their relative effects on quantum yield and blinking are not yet fully understood. Here we undertake a systematic, comparative study of adding inner shells of single composition vs gradient-alloyed shells of cadmium/zinc chalogenides onto CdSe cores, and then capping with a thin ZnS outer shell to form various core/multi-shell configurations. We show that the inner shell architecture between the CdSe core and the outer ZnS shell plays a significant role in both quantum yield and blinking dynamics but that these effects are not correlated – a high ensemble quantum yield doesn’t necessarily equate to reduced blinking. Two mathematical models have been proposed to describe the blinking dynamics – the more common power-law model and a more recent multi-exponential model. By binning the same data with 1 ms and 20 ms resolution, we show that the on-times can be better described by the multi-exponential model while the off-times can be better described by the power-law model. We discuss physical mechanisms that might explain this behavior and how it can be affected by the inner shell architecture.