Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Epigenetics, 8(6), p. 1029-1034

DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.8.16074

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The relationship between tumorMSLNmethylation and serum mesothelin (SMRP) in mesothelioma

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a cancer of poor prognosis. It is hoped that implementation of effective screening biomarkers will lead to earlier diagnoses and improved outcomes. Serum-measured soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) has been demonstrated to have excellent specificity for MPM, but poor sensitivity precludes its use as a screening biomarker. Using a case series of MPM patients from the International Mesothelioma Program at the Brigham and Women's hospital, we sought to determine whether epigenetic change at the MSLN gene in patient tumors is responsible for the poor sensitivity of SMRP. We identified three potential target regions for CpG methylation silencing in the MSLN promoter, one of which was amenable to bisulfite pyrosequencing and located 214 bp upstream of the transcription start site. MSLN promoter methylation was significantly higher in normal pleura than tumor tissue (P < 6.0x10-9). Next, we compared cases according to serum SMRP status and observed that MSLN methylation was significantly higher among tumors from patients testing negative for SMRP (< 1.5nM) versus those that were SMRP positive (P < 0.03). These results demonstrate that MSLN is normally methylated in the pleura, and that methylation is lost in most tumors. However, in a subset of tumors methylation is retained, and this mechanism explains the poor sensitivity of the SMRP assay. These results may lead to additional biomarker targets that will resolve the poor sensitivity of the SMRP assay and allow implementation of screening among exposed populations.