Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Society for Microbiology, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1(47), p. 231-237, 2003

DOI: 10.1128/aac.47.1.231-237.2003

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Combination of Drug Level Measurement and Parasite Genotyping Data for Improved Assessment of Amodiaquine and Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Efficacies in Treating Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Gabonese Children

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many African countries currently use a sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination (SP) or amodiaquine (AQ) to treat uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Both drugs represent the last inexpensive alternatives to chloroquine. However, resistant P. falciparum populations are largely reported in Africa, and it is compulsory to know the present situation of resistance. The in vivo World Health Organization standard 28-day test was used to assess the efficacy of AQ and SP to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Gabonese children under 10 years of age. To document treatment failures, molecular genotyping to distinguish therapeutic failures from reinfections and drug dosages were undertaken. A total of 118 and 114 children were given AQ or SP, respectively, and were monitored. SP was more effective than AQ, with 14.0 and 34.7% of therapeutic failures, respectively. Three days after initiation of treatment, the mean level of monodesethylamodiaquine (MdAQ) in plasma was 149 ng/ml in children treated with amodiaquine. In those treated with SP, mean levels of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine in plasma were 100 μg/ml and 212 ng/ml, respectively. Levels of the three drugs were higher in patients successfully treated with AQ (MdAQ plasma levels) or SP (sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine plasma levels). Blood concentration higher than breakpoints of 135 ng/ml for MdAQ, 100 μg/ml for sulfadoxine, and 175 ng/ml for pyrimethamine were associated with treatment success (odds ratio: 4.5, 9.8, and 11.8, respectively; all P values were <0.009). Genotyping of merozoite surface proteins 1 and 2 demonstrated a mean of 4.0 genotypes per person before treatment. At reappearance of parasitemia, both recrudescent parasites (represented by common bands in both samples) and newly inoculated parasites (represented by bands that were absent before treatment) were present in the blood of most (51.1%) children. Only 3 (6.4%) therapeutic failures were the result not of treatment inefficacy but of new infection. In areas where levels of drug resistance and complexity of infections are high, drug dosage and parasite genotyping may be of limited interest in improving the precision of drug efficacy measurement. Their use should be weighted according to logistical constraints.