Published in

Elsevier, Tourism Management, (47), p. 352-356

DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.009

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research

Journal article published in 2015 by Michael C. Hall, C. Michael Hall ORCID, Bas Amelung ORCID, Scott Cohen, Eke Eijgelaar ORCID, Stefan Gössling, Stefan Gossling, James Higham, Rik Leemans, Paul Peeters, Yael Ram, Daniel Scott, Carlo Aall, Bruno Abegg, Jorge E. Araña and other authors.
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses. ; Peer Reviewed