Oxford University Press (OUP), International Journal of Epidemiology, 1(31), p. 107-111
DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.1.107
Full text: Download
Systematic reviews of published time-to-event outcomes commonly rely on calculating odds ratios (OR) at fixed points in time and where actual numbers at risk are not presented. These estimates are usually based on the total numbers included in the published analysis and take no account of censoring. We have assessed the impact of adjusting for censoring on weighting, estimates and statistical heterogeneity of meta-analyses in cancer.