Published in

National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 42(103), p. 15338-15342, 2006

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602091103

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

“Dormant” secondary metal-alkyl complexes are not omnipresent

Journal article published in 2006 by Zygmunt Flisak ORCID, Tom Ziegler
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This theoretical study was inspired by the perpetual debate over the so-called “dormancy” of the active sites in propylene polymerization, i.e., a drop in their activity after a regioerror (2,1-insertion), which was reported to occur in many (although not all) catalytic systems. To explore the range of possible situations, we have selected two homogeneous systems of fundamentally different structure: an octahedral system of C 2 symmetry with a tetradentate O N N O ligand and a bridged indenyl catalyst. This choice was not accidental; it is in these two systems where the experimentalists cannot reach a consensus about dormancy. Our density-functional theory calculations explain why in certain catalytic systems both primary and secondary alkyl complexes can be equally reactive toward propylene polymerization, despite the intuitive concept of dormancy. To understand such a behavior, it was imperative to build an extensive model, including the counteranion and solvent effects. The discussion is also supplemented by our latest calculations on the classical second-generation Ziegler–Natta system.