Published in

World Scientific Publishing, International Journal of Modern Physics E, 12(24), p. 1550097

DOI: 10.1142/s0218301315500974

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Particle-number conservation in quasiparticle representation in the isovector neutron–proton pairing case

Journal article published in 2015 by M. Fellah, N. H. Allal, Faiza Hammache ORCID, M. R. Oudih
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Until now, the Sharp-Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (SBCS) particle-number projection method, in the isovector neutron–proton pairing case, has been developed in the particle representation. However, this formalism is sometimes complicated and cumbersome. In this work, the formalism is developed in the quasiparticle representation. An expression of the projected ground state wave function is proposed. Expressions of the energy as well as the expectation values of the total particle-number operator and its square are deduced. It is shown that these expressions are formally similar to their homologues in the pairing between like-particles case. They are easier to handle than the ones obtained using the particle representation and are more adapted to numerical calculations. The method is then numerically tested within the schematic one-level model, which allows comparisons with exact results, as well as in the case of even–even nuclei within the Woods–Saxon model. In each case, it is shown that the particle-number fluctuations that are inherent to the BCS method are completely eliminated by the projection. In the framework of the one-level model, the values of the projected energy are clearly closer to the exact values than the BCS ones. In realistic cases, the relative discrepancies between projected and unprojected values of the energy are small. However, the absolute deviations may reach several MeV.