Published in

Kluwer, Symposium- International Astronomical Union, (179), p. 437-443, 1998

DOI: 10.1017/s0074180900129249

New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys, p. 437-443

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1485-8_110

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Cross wavelength comparison of images and catalogs

Journal article published in 1997 by James G. Bartlett, Daniel Egret ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We would like to start this discussion by attempting to make a useful, working distinction between catalogs and databases of astronomical objects. It seems to us that such a distinction could be made based upon the mode of access to the information: A catalog may be considered as a list of objects, almost invariably ordered by coordinates; a database, on the other hand, may be distinguished by its ability to extract a set of objects based on user-given criteria, such as all objects within a certain sky region with magnitudes brighter than m in the blue. Catalogs form the basis of the database, which adds the means of multi-criteria access to the information. In concrete terms, one usually thinks of SIMBAD, NED and LEDA as databases, while an ftp site containing electronic lists of objects may be thought of as a catalog storage warehouse.