Published in

American Astronomical Society, Astrophysical Journal, 2(801), p. 130, 2015

DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/130

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Pulsar Timing Errors from Asynchronous Multi-Frequency Sampling of Dispersion Measure Variations

Journal article published in 2014 by M. T. Lam, J. M. Cordes, S. Chatterjee ORCID, T. Dolch ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Free electrons in the interstellar medium cause frequency-dependent delays in pulse arrival times due to both scattering and dispersion. Multi-frequency measurements are used to estimate and remove dispersion delays. In this paper, we focus on the effect of any non-simultaneity of multi-frequency observations on dispersive delay estimation and removal. Interstellar density variations combined with changes in the line-of-sight from pulsar and observer motions cause dispersion measure variations with an approximately power-law power spectrum, augmented in some cases by linear trends. We simulate time series, estimate the magnitude and statistical properties of timing errors that result from non-simultaneous observations, and derive prescriptions for data acquisition that are needed in order to achieve a specified timing precision. For nearby, highly stable pulsars, measurements need to be simultaneous to within about one day in order that the timing error from asynchronous DM correction is less than about 10 ns. We discuss how timing precision improves when increasing the number of dual-frequency observations used in dispersion measure estimation for a given epoch. For a Kolmogorov wavenumber spectrum, we find about a factor of two improvement in precision timing when increasing from two to three observations but diminishing returns thereafter. ; Comment: 8 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal