Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

ICE Publishing, Magazine of Concrete Research, 110(32), p. 17-27, 1980

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1980.32.110.17

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Workability of flowing concrete

Journal article published in 1980 by P. F. G. Banfill ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Synopsis By using the two-point test for workability, the effect of concentration of superplasticizing admixture upon workability has been found to be independent of the types of admixture and cement, Differences in the effects of proprietary admixtures are due to their different solids contents. The yield value of concrete decreases to a minimum, beyond which further additions of admixture promote segregation. Loss of workability is not necessarily more rapid in flowing concrete, and re-dosing enables workability to be maintained for more than 160 minutes without detriment the hardened strength. The melamine formaldehyde admixture caused more rapid workability loss than the naphthalene formaldehyde admixture tested, but a specific interaction between the former and a cement of low C3A/SO4 ratio was found. An acceptance criterion for flowing concrete is proposed.