Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Society for Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, 43(29), p. 13435-13444, 2009

DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3257-09.2009

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Macrophages dominate sites of central nervous system (CNS) injury where they promote both injury and repair. These divergent effects may be caused by distinct macrophage subsets, i.e., “classically-activated” pro-inflammatory (M1) or “alternatively-activated” anti-inflammatory (M2) cells. Here, we show that an M1 macrophage response is rapidly induced then maintained at sites of traumatic spinal cord injury and that this response overwhelms a comparatively smaller and transient M2 macrophage response. The high M1:M2 macrophage ratio has significant implications for CNS repair. Indeed, we present novel data showing that only M1 macrophages are neurotoxic and M2 macrophages promote a regenerative growth response in adult sensory axons, even in the context of inhibitory substrates that dominate sites of CNS injury (e.g., proteoglycans and myelin). Together, these data suggest that polarizing the differentiation of resident microglia and infiltrating blood monocytes toward an M2 or “alternatively” activated macrophage phenotype could promote CNS repair while limiting secondary inflammatory-mediated injury.