Published in

Wiley, ELECTROPHORESIS, 7(21), p. 1395-1404, 2000

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(20000401)21:7<1395::aid-elps1395>3.0.co;2-c

Wiley-VCH Verlag, ELECTROPHORESIS, 7(21), p. 1395-1404

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(20000401)21:7<1395::aid-elps1395>3.3.co;2-3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

In-line coupling capillary electrochromatography with amperometric detection for analysis of explosive compounds

Journal article published in 2000 by Abdelkader Hilmi, Jht H. T. Luong ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Amperometric detection at a bare gold electrode has been in-line coupled with capillary electrochromatography (CEC) for analysis of nitroaromatic and nitroamine explosives in contaminated soils and ground water. The CEC column packed with 3 μm C18 particles performed best using a mobile phase containing 70—80% methanol, 30 or 20% water, 5 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 10mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES). In contrast, the separation column packed with 1.5 μm C18 particles exhibited the best separation when only 30% methanol was added to a mobile phase containing 70% water, 7 mM SDS, and 10 mM MES. The detection, based on electrochemical reduction of the explosives (−0.7 or −1 V vs. Ag/AgCl, depending upon the level of methanol in the mobile phase), was compatible with such mobile phases. The detection limits for 13 explosives ranged from 100 to 200 ppb, i.e., about twofold better than those obtained with electrokinetic chromatography (EKC)/amperometric detection. From an operational viewpoint, exhaustive column conditioning was a prerequisite and care should be taken to prevent bubble formation and current breakdown during the course of separation. The CEC column equipped with amperometric detection successfully measured explosives in ground water and extracts prepared from contaminated soils and the results obtained agreed well with those of the U.S. Environmental protection Agency (EPA) method.