Published in

MA Healthcare, Journal of Wound Care, 8(9), p. 385-388, 2000

DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2000.9.8.26283

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Investigating the bacterial barrier properties of four contemporary wound dressings

Journal article published in 2000 by H. Ameen, K. Moore, J. C. Lawrence, K. G. Harding ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The ability of four wound dressings (CombiDERM, Allevyn Hydrocellular, Tegaderm and Tielle) to resist penetration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was investigated in vitro using a dedicated test apparatus. With the exception of Tielle, each dressing prevented bacterial transmission over an 11-day challenge period. When both the wound contact surface and the external surface of Tielle were directly challenged with a bacterial suspension, penetration of the dressing was observed within three to five days. The breakdown of its outer membrane could explain the inability of Tielle to maintain a barrier to the passage of the test bacteria used in this wound model. On the basis of these data, CombiDERM, Allevyn Hydrocellular and Tegaderm dressings may facilitate infection control by acting as a physical barrier to the transmission of potentially pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant wound bacteria. However, further research is urgently required to determine whether or not the same results are observed in clinical practice.