Published in

MA Healthcare, British Journal of Community Nursing, 9(15), p. 419-419, 2010

DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2010.15.9.78096

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Dying at home: access should be equitable

Journal article published in 2010 by Claire Goodman ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

For a document that is wholly based on statistics, the recent report from the National End of Life Care Intelligence Network (NEoLCIN) on variations in place of death in England (NEoLCIN, 2010) is fascinating reading. It highlights the differences across the country in where people die and challenges assumptions about what can and can’t be achieved for people who want to die at home. Too often we judge effectiveness on the basis of the individual case. This report helps us to look beyond personal experience and individual services. It sets a benchmark against which to judge how health and social care services are supporting people to die at home.