Published in

Cambridge University Press, British Journal of Psychiatry, 4(208), p. 374-380, 2016

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153312

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Practice nurse-led proactive care for chronic depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Journal article published in 2016 by Marta Buszewicz, Mark Griffin, Elaine M. McMahon, Kate Walters ORCID, Michael King
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BackgroundManagement of long-term depression is a significant problem in primary care populations with considerable on-going morbidity, but few studies have focused on this group.AimsTo evaluate whether structured, nurse-led proactive care of patients with chronic depression in primary care improves outcomes.MethodParticipants with chronic/recurrent major depression or dysthymia were recruited from 42 UK general practices and randomised to general practitioner (GP) treatment as usual or nurse intervention over 2 years (the ProCEED trial, trial registration: ISRCTN36610074).ResultsIn total 282 people received the intervention and there were 276 controls. At 24 months there was no significant improvement in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score or quality of life (Euroquol-EQ-VAS), but a significant improvement in functional impairment (Work and Social Activity Schedule, WSAS) of 2.5 (95% CI 0.6–4.3, P = 0.010) in the intervention group. The impact per practice-nurse intervention session was –0.37 (95% CI –0.68 to –0.07, P = 0.017) on the BDI-II score and –0.33 (95% CI –0.55 to –0.10, P = 0.004) on the WSAS score, indicating that attending all 10 intervention sessions could lead to a BDI-II score reduction of 3.7 points compared with controls.ConclusionsThe intervention improved functioning in these patients, the majority of whom had complex long-term difficulties, but only had a significant impact on depressive symptoms in those engaging with the full intervention.