Published in

Oxford University Press, Journal of Communication, 1(66), p. 102-138, 2016

DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12198

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking

Journal article published in 2016 by Lucas Graves, Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

© 2016 International Communication Association. Why has fact-checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact-checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact-checking increased the prevalence of fact-checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact-checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.