Published in

Karger Publishers, Acta Cytologica, 3(58), p. 275-280, 2014

DOI: 10.1159/000363174

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Detection of Common and Less Frequent <b><i>EGFR</i></b> Mutations in Cytological Samples of Lung Cancer

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer death. <i>EGFR</i> mutations, detected<b> </b>in 10-40% of lung adenocarcinomas, are an essential key to therapeutic management. <i>EGFR</i>-activated mutations comprise mainly deletions in exon 19 and point mutations in exon 21. Although histology is the traditional method of detection,<b> </b>we investigated the role of cytology in <i>EGFR</i> mutations. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> A total of 774 lung cancers were studied for <i>EGFR</i> mutations (676 histological and 98 cytological samples), including 424 adenocarcinomas, 326 non-small cell lung carcinomas not otherwise specified, and 24 squamous cell carcinomas. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We had a total of 164 (21.2%) cases of mutations. Common mutations were short in-frame deletions in exon 19 (53.7%) and single-nucleotide substitutions in exon 21 (34.1%); less frequent mutations included single-nucleotide substitutions in exon 18 (3.7%) and in-frame insertions/deletions in exon 20 (8.5%). Histologically, <i>EGFR</i> mutations in exons 19 and 21 occurred in 19.4% and in exons 18 and 20 in 2.2%, while the rates cytologically were 13.3% for exons 19 and 21 and 5.1% for exons 18 and 20. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The sensitivity for the detection of <i>EGFR</i> mutations in cytological samples overlaps histology, so the use of cytological material constitutes an adequate approach for treatment selection in patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer.