Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Karger Publishers, Urologia Internationalis, 3(93), p. 311-319, 2014

DOI: 10.1159/000360483

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Outcome of Patients with Pathological Tumor Stage T3 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder following Radical Cystectomy in a Single-Center Series with 116 Patients

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Outcome prediction of pT3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) remains challenging. The objective of our study was to determine high-risk patients with poor survival outcome in a heterogeneous group substaged pT3 who might profit from early adjuvant chemotherapy. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We compiled clinicopathological and immunohistochemical data of E-cadherin (E-cad) expression in 116 patients with pT3 UCB after RC in our single-center series. Multivariable Cox regression models including substaged pT3 established clinicopathological features, and the expression of the predictive immunohistochemical feature E-cad was used to identify independent predictors on progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No significant differences were found addressing clinicopathological data and substaged pT3. In multivariable Cox regression models, lymph node involvement was an independent predictor for PFS (p < 0.001), CSS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002), respectively. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) significantly influenced PFS (p = 0.016). ASA score 3/4 independently predicted CSS (p = 0.049) and OS (p = 0.032). Neither pT3 substages nor E-cad expression were significant prognosticators for survival. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In pT3 UCB patients with ASA 3/4, positive lymph node status and/or presence of LVI, administration of chemotherapy should be considered due to the high risk of poor oncological outcome. The immunohistochemical marker E-cad was not an independent predictor.