Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Acoustical Society of America, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 6(128), p. 3614

DOI: 10.1121/1.3500673

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release

Journal article published in 2010 by Robert H. Pierzycki ORCID, Bernhard U. Seeber
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The contribution of temporal fine structure (TFS) information to co-modulation masking release (CMR) was examined by comparing CMR obtained with unprocessed or vocoded stimuli. Tone thresholds were measured in the presence of a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated on-frequency band (OFB) of noise and zero, two, or four flanking bands (FBs) of noise whose envelopes were either co- or anti-modulated with the OFB envelope. Vocoding replaced the TFS of the tone and masker with unrelated TFS of noise or sinusoidal carriers. Maximum CMR of 11 dB was found as the difference between the co- and anti-modulated conditions for unprocessed stimuli. After vocoding, tone thresholds increased by 7 dB, and CMR was reduced to about 4 dB but remained significant. The magnitude of CMR was similar for both the sine and the noise vocoder. Co-modulation improved detection in the vocoded condition despite the absence of the tone-masker TFS interactions; thus CMR appears to be a robust mechanism based on across-frequency processing. TFS information appears to contribute to across-channel CMR since the magnitude of CMR was significantly reduced after vocoding. Since CMR was evidenced despite vocoding, it is hoped that co-modulation would also improve detection in cochlear-implant listening.