Published in

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(10), p. 10621-10638, 2010

DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-10621-2010

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 4(10), p. 8447-8486

DOI: 10.5194/acpd-10-8447-2010

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Peroxy radical partitioning during the AMMA radical intercomparison exercise

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Peroxy radicals were measured onboard two scientific aircrafts during the AMMA (African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis) campaign in summer 2006. This paper reports results from the flight on 16 August 2006 during which measurements of HO[subscript 2] by laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy at low pressure (LIF-FAGE) and total peroxy radicals (RO[subscript 2]* = HO[subscript 2]+ΣRO[subscript 2], R = organic chain) by two similar instruments based on the peroxy radical chemical amplification (PeRCA) technique were subject of a blind intercomparison. The German DLR-Falcon and the British FAAM-BAe-146 flew wing tip to wing tip for about 30 min making concurrent measurements on 2 horizontal level runs at 697 and 485 hPa over the same geographical area in Burkina Faso. A full set of supporting measurements comprising photolysis frequencies, and relevant trace gases like CO, NO, NO[subscript 2], NO[subscript y], O[subscript 3] and a wider range of VOCs were collected simultaneously. Results are discussed on the basis of the characteristics and limitations of the different instruments used. Generally, no data bias are identified and the RO[subscript 2]* data available agree quite reasonably within the instrumental errors. The [RO[subscript 2]*]/[HO[subscript 2]] ratios, which vary between 1:1 and 3:1, as well as the peroxy radical variability, concur with variations in photolysis rates and in other potential radical precursors. Model results provide additional information about dominant radical formation and loss processes. ; Peer-reviewed ; Publisher Version ; 44219