Published in

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Survey of Anesthesiology, 3(58), p. 122, 2014

DOI: 10.1097/sa.0000000000000049

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Anesthesiology, 3(119), p. 703-718, 2013

DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e31829374c2

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Anesthesiology, 4(120), p. 1061

DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000445214.31459.1c

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Neuraxial Anesthesia in Parturients with Intracranial Pathology: A Comprehensive Review and Reassessment of Risk

Journal article published in 2014 by Lisa R. Leffert, &Na;, Lee H. Schwamm ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractParturients with intracranial lesions are often assumed to have increased intracranial pressure, even in the absence of clinical and radiographic signs. The risk of herniation after an inadvertent dural puncture is frequently cited as a contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia. This article reviews the relevant literature on the use of neuraxial anesthesia in parturients with known intracranial pathology, and proposes a framework and recommendations for assessing risk of neurologic deterioration, with epidural analgesia or anesthesia, or planned or inadvertent dural puncture. The authors illustrate these concepts with numerous case examples and provide guidance for the practicing anesthesiologist in determining the safety of neuraxial anesthesia.