Published in

Cambridge University Press, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 9(24), p. 667-672, 2003

DOI: 10.1086/502276

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Epidemiology of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusat a University Hospital in the Canary Islands

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjectives:To describe the epidemiology of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) at a university hospital in Tenerife, Canary Islands, during a 40-month period and to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of control measures.Design:Laboratory-based surveillance, medical charts and microbiological records review, and characterization of strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were used to describe the epidemiology. Infection control practices were introduced as an intervention.Setting:A 650-bed, tertiary-care university hospital.Subjects:Patients with clinical and nasal isolates of MRSA and colonized staff members.Results:The rate of nosocomial MRSA infections was 32.5% for 1997, 17.9% for 1998, 14.5% for 1999, and 25.6% during the first 4 months of 2000. The major sites of isolation for nosocomial MRSA infection included surgical wounds (25%) and the lower respiratory tract (24%). Intensive care units and surgical specialties had more frequent MRSA cases. Characteristics associated with nosocomial MRSA isolates included prior use of intensive antibiotic therapy, prolonged hospital stays, major underlying illness, invasive procedures, and older age. PFGE type A (subtype A1) was the strain most frequently found and the only PFGE type involved in clusters.Conclusions:Surveillance cultures and contact droplet precautions were followed by decreased rates for 2 years. Nevertheless, the spread of PFGE subtype Al to many different areas of the hospital and the increase in incidence during the first third of 2000 indicates either that surveillance cultures were not used widely enough or that compliance with isolation measures was suboptimal.